FUL1
MAN1
BOU0
LIV1
LEE0
CRY0
MNC5
SUN3
NFO0
COV1
BHA3
ARS0
EVE1
IPS0
NEW2
HUL1
TOT2
AVL3
NOR3
BOL4
WOL1
WBA0
BIR2
MID2
BUR1
DER1
LCN1
SWA2Photo: sports.yahoo.com
Trump has thoughts on Kane. Of course he does.
England are out of a home-soil World Cup at the semi-final stage, beaten 2-1 by Argentina on Wednesday, and the nation is still processing it. Then Donald Trump walked into a press conference and started talking about Harry Kane's positioning. This is where we are now.
What Trump actually said
Speaking ahead of the World Cup final and third-place playoff, Trump told reporters he had watched the England vs Argentina semi-final and took issue with how England deployed Kane. The specifics of his critique, as reported by CaughtOffside, are not fully detailed — but the thrust was clear enough: he thought England made a mistake with their use of the Bayern Munich striker, and he was not shy about saying so.
Trump did not look like a man who was about to stop talking about football.
Does he have a point?
Here is the uncomfortable part: the question of how England use Kane is not a new one, and it did not start with a presidential press conference. For much of this tournament, the tension has been whether to play Kane as a traditional centre-forward — the target man who drops deep, links play, and occasionally vanishes from the penalty area for long stretches — or to demand he stay central and live off the service.
Against Argentina, in a semi-final England needed to win, that tension mattered. A 2-1 defeat suggests England created enough to be in the game but not enough to win it. Whether Kane's deployment was the reason, or a symptom of a broader tactical problem, is a legitimate debate — regardless of who is raising it.
What this means for England's rebuild
This is England's third semi-final exit in recent major tournaments — and the first on home soil in a very long time. The hurt is real. A generation of players who have been building toward this moment — Kane among them — have come up short again, and this time there is no away-leg excuse, no hostile crowd to blame.
The Argentina defeat will be picked apart for weeks. Whoever takes charge of England next will face questions about shape, about Kane's role, about whether the system is built around their best player or in spite of him. Those are serious conversations that deserve serious analysis.
The absurdity is the point
Trump weighing in does not make the tactical questions less valid — but it does tell you something about the scale of this tournament's reach. A sitting US president, in a country that hosted the World Cup partly to grow the domestic game, is now offering unsolicited verdicts on England's centre-forward deployment.
For England fans, that is cold comfort. They would rather be preparing for a final.
Sources1 source
Flagside's editors read every piece we publish. We work from the football press, write our own copy rather than reprinting anyone's, and check each article for accuracy and sourcing. Every outlet that fed into this piece is named under Sources.
The day's football, in your inbox at 7 AM. Nothing else.
Pick of the night's matches, what the transfer window's doing, and the one column you should read today. No ads. No tips. No operators.
One-click unsubscribe. We do not share emails.
Comments
Loading comments…